Articles Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Alamtara: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam

Dari Mimbar ke Mesin: Transformasi Otoritas Komunikasi Dakwah dan Perilaku Pencarian Informasi Islam di Era Artificial Intelligence

Authors

Abd Kholiq
Universitas Tarbiyatut Tholabah Lamongan
Shofiyah
Universitas Tarbiyatut Tholabah Lamongan
Diterbitkan: 2026-06-30
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58518/alamtara.v10i1.5463
Bagikan Artikel Ini:
WhatsApp Facebook X

Downloads / Naskah Lengkap

Akses Terbuka
Unduh Berkas Lengkap Artikel Format PDF | Bebas diunduh dan dibaca untuk keperluan akademik & sitasi

Abstract

The rapid development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) has fundamentally disrupted the landscape of religious communication. This study examines how AI technologies transform the dynamics of Islamic communication (da'wah) authority and patterns of Islamic information-seeking behavior. Utilizing a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology based on the PRISMA protocol, this paper analyzes 42 international peer-reviewed studies indexed in Scopus (Q1/Q2). The findings reveal three core insights: (1) A noticeable shift from institutional authority (scholars and traditional Islamic institutions) toward algorithmic epistemic authority, where automated models are perceived as neutral and swift knowledge mediators; (2) A behavioral transition in information-seeking from document-based retrieval to conversational interactive dialogue, simplifying complex legal deduction (istinbāṭ) into instantaneous linguistic probabilities; and (3) The emergence of epistemic harm and algorithmic hallucination, which necessitates the integration of Islamic ethical frameworks (Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah) alongside a human-in-the-loop governance model. The study concludes that AI cannot substitute the epistemological depth of Islamic scholars (‘ulamā’), but should instead function as a supporting technology subject to critical verification (tabayyun).

Kata Kunci:
#Artificial Intelligence #Communication Authority #Digital Da'wah #Information-Seeking Behavior #Algorithmic Epistemology

Kata Kunci / Keywords

5 Kata Kunci

Daftar Pustaka / References

40 Referensi
  1. Abid, A., Farooqi, M., & Zou, J. (2021). Large language models associate Muslims with violence. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(6), 461–463. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00359-2
  2. Al Giffari, A., & Dermawan, A. (2025). Rhetorical comparison between AI-generated Islamic sermons and traditional scholars: Ethos, pathos, and logos in digital da'wah. Journal of Media and Religion, 24(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2025.2411098
  3. APJII. (2024). Laporan profil internet Indonesia 2024. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. https://apjii.or.id/survei
  4. Arif, M., Abd Aziz, M. K. N., Hassan, H., Fikri, Y., Zekkari, M., & Rismawati, B. V. (2026). Artificial intelligence in Islamic religious education: A PRISMA-based review and the SEI-CHAT framework. Online Learning in Educational Research, 6(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i1.993
  5. Aritonang, I., Barus, L. N. U., & Rubino, R. (2025). Ethics of artificial intelligence in Islamic preaching content production: Authenticity and moral responsibility. International Journal of Cyber Communication, 8(2), 112–129.
  6. Aziz, A. (2019). Ilmu dakwah (Edisi Revisi). Kencana.
  7. Barus, L. N. U., Aritonang, I., & Rubino, R. (2026). Navigating AI hallucination in Islamic religious information: The role of digital tabayyun. Journal of Islamic Communication Studies, 12(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.15408/jics.v12i1.38910
  8. Bunt, G. R. (2023). Hashtag Islam: How cyber-Islamic environments are evolving jihad, fatwas, and digital everyday life. University of North Carolina Press.
  9. Campbell, H. A. (2021). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in digital worlds (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295690
  10. Cheong, P. H. (2020). Religion, communication, and artificial intelligence: Faith in the algorithm. Journal of Media and Religion, 19(3), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2020.1830907
  11. Cheong, P. H. (2021). Bounded authority: Authority and identity in digital religion. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, Article 106822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106822
  12. Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioural model for information retrieval system design. Journal of Information Science, 15(4-5), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158901500406
  13. Evolvi, G. (2022). Religion and the internet: Digital religion, (dis)embodiment, and online community. Coda, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13030240
  14. Fattah, M. N. (2024). Shift of credibility indicators: From scholarly authority to speed of access in digital Islamic queries. Journal of Islamic Media and Communication, 5(1), 77–94.
  15. Hamidalloh, A. S., Thobroni, A. Y., & Suyudi, M. (2026). ChatGPT as an algorithmic epistemic mediator in contextual Islamic religious education and religious moderation. Jurnal Ilmiah Guru Madrasah, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2829/jigm.v7i1.116
  16. Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
  17. Hujairama, M., Rahman, A., & Sulaeman, S. (2024). Generative AI and fatwa issuance: Algorithmic challenges to Islamic jurisprudence. Asian Journal of Philosophy and Religion, 3(2), 145–162.
  18. Insana, N., & Satriah, S. (2025). AI chatbots as religious consultation media: Efficiency versus theological authority. Journal of Digital Islam and Society, 4(1), 89–106.
  19. Kabir, M., & Kabir, M. R. (2024). Islamic lifestyle applications and user trust: Evaluating digital religious consultation tools. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 13(2), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-bja10088
  20. Lövheim, M., & Lundby, K. (2013). Mediated religion: From religious authority to strategic communication. The International Communication Gazette, 75(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048512461764
  21. Lustig, C., & Nardi, B. (2014). Algorithmic authority: The case of Bitcoin. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1372–1381. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.176
  22. Mahud, A. (2025). Transfomasi struktur otoritas keagamaan era kecerdasan buatan: Dialektika antara otoritas figuratif dan algoritmik. Journal of Digital Religion, 1(1), 145–158.
  23. Manduri, M. A., Rohman, F., & Zaid, N. (2025). Religious authority in the digital narrative of NU Online in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 19(1), 211–235. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2025.19.1.211-235
  24. Mouhoub, M. A. (2026). Trustworthy Islamic AI systems: Verification mechanisms, source citations, and Maqasid al-Shariah alignment. International Journal of Islamic Applications in Computer Science, 14(1), 33–50.
  25. Mulyana, D. (2022). Ilmu komunikasi: Suatu pengantar (Edisi 27). Remaja Rosdakarya.
  26. Niam, M. F. (2024). Algorithmic authority dalam pencarian hukum Islam: Studi kritis atas penggunaan AI oleh generasi Z. Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Komunikasi, 10(2), 189–208.
  27. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  28. Purwaningtyas, F., Dalimunte, M., & Dewi, S. (2024). Conversational information seeking behavior on religious topics among Indonesian youth. Library & Information Science Research, 46(3), Article 101311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2024.101311
  29. Reuters Institute. (2024). Digital news report 2024. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2024
  30. Shah, A. M., Nadeem, M., Sohail, S. S., & Hussain, A. (2025). Exploring religious bias in multilingual large language models across major religions. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2025.1098
  31. Shihab, M. Q. (2012). Tafsir al-Mishbah: Kesan, pesan dan keserasian Al-Qur'an (Vol. 2). Lentera Hati.
  32. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  33. Spitzer, M. (2023). ChatGPT: Artificial intelligence and cognitive offloading. Nervenheilkunde, 42(4), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1948-8785
  34. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
  35. Tsuria, R. (2021). Digital religion: Definition and research direction. Digital Religion Studies, 3(1), 12–29.
  36. Ullah, M. A., Haque, M. S., & Islam, M. M. (2026). Artificial intelligence applications in religious contexts: Opportunities, hallucination risks, and ethical governance. Technology in Society, 76, Article 102450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.102450
  37. UNESCO. (2024). AI readiness assessment methodology: Implementation of the recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence in Indonesia. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000389210
  38. Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007145
  39. Zaid, N., Arifin, M., & Syafiq, A. (2025). From prayer to data: The transformation of theology in the age of artificial intelligence. Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies, 42(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265378825121109
  40. Zed, M. (2018). Metode penelitian kepustakaan (Edisi 4). Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Informasi Terbitan

Issue
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Alamtara: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam
Section
Articles
Published
2026-06-30

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Alamtara: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

How to Cite

Kholiq, A., & Shofiyah. (2026). Dari Mimbar ke Mesin: Transformasi Otoritas Komunikasi Dakwah dan Perilaku Pencarian Informasi Islam di Era Artificial Intelligence. Alamtara: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 10(1), 198-206. https://doi.org/10.58518/alamtara.v10i1.5463

Similar Articles

71-80 of 137

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.