Artikel Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir

Transformation of Scientific Interpretation in Indonesia: An Epistemological Criticism of the Scientific-Religious Paradigm in the Works of Purwanto and Mustofa

Penulis

Firdarini
Department of Study of Religion University of California Riverside, California, United States
Vieka Tauhidah
Hasani Ahmad Said
Diterbitkan: 2025-12-31
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqan.v8i2.4238
Bagikan Artikel Ini:
WhatsApp Facebook X

Unduhan / Naskah Lengkap

Akses Terbuka
Unduh Berkas Lengkap Artikel Format PDF | Bebas diunduh dan dibaca untuk keperluan akademik & sitasi

Abstrak

The development of scientific interpretation (tafsīr ʿilmī) in Indonesia reflects an ongoing attempt to negotiate the relationship between Qur’anic revelation and modern scientific knowledge, while simultaneously raising epistemological questions concerning interpretive boundaries and methodological legitimacy. This study examines the transformation of scientific interpretation in the Indonesian context through a comparative analysis of the interpretive approaches of Agus Purwanto and Agus Mustofa, particularly in their engagement with kauniyyah verses. The primary objective of this research is to identify the dominant patterns of scientific interpretation employed by both figures and to assess their continuity with classical exegetical principles. Adopting a qualitative-descriptive design, this study employs comparative textual analysis supported by an evaluative framework derived from classical tafsīr theory, emphasizing linguistic accuracy, rhetorical coherence, and theological consistency as articulated by al-Zahabi. Primary data are drawn from the major works of Purwanto and Mustofa and are contextualized through relevant classical and contemporary literature on scientific exegesis. The findings demonstrate that Purwanto advances a revelation-based, scientific-textual model in which modern science functions as an explanatory tool subordinate to the Qur’anic text. In contrast, Mustofa represents a rational-speculative approach that positions contemporary scientific theories as the primary interpretive lens for metaphysical Qur’anic concepts. This study contributes to Qur’anic studies by offering an epistemological mapping of scientific interpretation in Indonesia and by advancing a critical framework for integrating scientific reasoning with textual fidelity and theological integrity in contemporary exegesis.

Kata Kunci:
#Scientific Interpretation #Kauniyyah Verses #Epistemology of Tafsir #, Indonesian Islam #Contemporary Qur’anic Studies

Kata Kunci / Kata Kunci

5 Kata Kunci

Daftar Pustaka / Referensi

44 Referensi
  1. al-Jazāiriy, A. B. (1997). Aisar al-tafāsīr (Vol. 1). Maktabah al-‘Ulūm wa al-Ḥikam.
  2. Al-Suyūṭī, J. al-D. (n.d.). Al-Itqān fī ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān. Markaz Dirāsāt Qur’āniyyah
  3. Al-Zahabi, Muhammad Husein (1976). At-Tafsir Wa Al-Mufassirun . Juz 2. Cairo: Maktabah Wahbah
  4. Abidin, A. Z., Aziz, T., & Noorhidayati, S. (2024). QUR’ANIC EXEGESIS AS A SOCIAL CRITIQUE A Study on the Traditionalist Bisri Musthofa’s Tafsīr al-Ibrīz. Al-Jami’ah, 62(1), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2024.621.215-239
  5. Amir, A. N. (2021). Kitab al-Tafsir wal Mufassirun dan Pengaruhnya dalam Kajian Tafsir. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 1(3), 280-285.
  6. Amir, S., Norasid, M. A., & Hilmi, A. B. A. (2023). Scientific Studies of the Qur’ān in the Contemporary Era: An Analysis of Concept, History, and Methodology. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 13(1), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.131.13
  7. Asvia, E. S. (2018). Telaah Epistemologi Penafsiran Agus Mustofa (Studi Ayat-Ayat Akhirat dalam Tafsir Ilmi). Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta.
  8. Badan Pusat Pengembangan Bahasa. (2025). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. https://kbbi.web.id/ilmu
  9. Badawi, M. A. F., & Zulkarnaini, Z. (2021). The Relevance of Muhammad Abduh’s Thought in Indonesian Tafsir; Analysis of Tafsir Al-Azhar. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 21(1), 113–148. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol21.iss1.art5
  10. Badri Yatim. (2017). Sejarah peradaban Islam. Rajawali Press.
  11. Bigliardi, S. (2017). THE “SCIENTIFIC MIRACLE OF THE QUR’ĀN,” PSEUDOSCIENCE, AND CONSPIRACISM. Zygon, 52(1), 146–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12321
  12. Bin Sapran Hrp, A. H., Mohd Yusoff, M. Y. Z., & Muhamad, A. (2021). The Biological Elements in Integrated IPA Textbook in Indonesia: Analysis Based on Tafsir ‘Iimi. Quranica, 13(1), 133–164. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85218234249&partnerID=40&md5=2bb5131380b91c5e808eba02e7442580
  13. Darmadi. (2017). Integrasi agama dan ilmu pengetahuan. Diandra Kreatif.
  14. Darmawan, E. (2024). Perkembangan tafsir di indonesia kontemporer. Mashadiruna Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 3, 101-8. https://doi.org/10.15575/mjiat.v3i2.25310
  15. Darojat, A. R. (2023). Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Pertanian dalam Al-Qur'an: Studi Komparatif antara Tafsir Al-Mishbah dan Tafsir Ilmi Kemenag RI. Nun: Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Tafsir Di Nusantara, 9(2), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.32495/nun.v9i2.378
  16. Daruhadi, G. (2024). Kritik Wacana Tafsir Tentang Tafsir Ilmi: Ilmu-Ilmu Murni (Pure Sciencies). Jurnal Locus Penelitian Dan Pengabdian, 3(8), 704-716. https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v3i8.3071
  17. Fadhliyah, L. (2024). Kajian Kesarjanaan Tafsir Indonesia:: Analisis Perbandingan Cara Kerja Islah Gusmian, Ervan Nurtawab, dan Jajang A. Rohmana. Nun: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Tafsir di Nusantara, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.32495/nun.v10i1.408
  18. Firdarini, & Syarifuddin, M. A. (2023). Corak ilmi dalam Tafsir Al-Misbah. Ushuluna, 9(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.15408/ushuluna.v9i01.32241
  19. Hakim Zanky. (2025). Trensains: Pesantren sains pertama di Indonesia. https://trensains.sch.id
  20. Hariani, H. (2023). The Ottoman Approach to Scientific Classification in Tafsir History: A Study of Taskopruluzade Ahmad Efendi’s ‘Miftâhu’s-Saâde.’ Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 24(2), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v24i2.4521
  21. Hashim, M., & Taeali, A. (2022). ‘Uzlah and Dhikr in Sufi Isharī’s Exegesis Al-Baḥr Al-Madīd by Ibn ‘Ajībah. Afkar, 24(1), 33–64. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol24no1.2
  22. Hayat, A., Hussain, S., Raza, H. G. R., Aslam, E., Hussain, M., & Chand, A. (2023). Obstacles to Scientific Interpretation of the Holy Quran and Their Solutions. Russian Law Journal, 11(4), 309-315.
  23. Izzan, A. (2011). Metodologi ilmu tafsir. Tafakur.
  24. Khoirudin, A. (2017). Sains Islam berbasis nalar ayat-ayat semesta. At-Ta'dib, 12(1), 195-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v12i1.883
  25. Koç, M. A. (2023). On the Allegedly Overstated Importance of aṭ-Tạbarī (d. 310/922) within the Sunnī Exegetical Tradition: An Answer to Walid Saleh*. Zeitschrift Der Deutschen Morgenlandischen Gesellschaft, 173(2), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.13173/ZDMG.173.2.343
  26. Putra, R. M., Jawhariyah, W., & Komarudin, E. (2024). Dinamika Perkembangan Tafsir Ilmi di Indonesia. MALAY Studies: History, Culture and Civilization Vol. 3, 3(2).
  27. Mauluddin, M., Firdaus, M. F., Munir, M., & Azkiyah, U. M. (2025). Sufi Hermeneutics and Symbolic Tafsir in the Javanese Manuscript Hakikate Bismillah. In Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur’an dan Hadis (Vol. 26, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v26i2.6315
  28. Mubarak, H. (2018). Change through continuity: A case study of Q. 4:34 in Ibn cAshur’s al-Tarir wa’l-Tanwir. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 20(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2018.0318
  29. Muhammad Alwi, H. S., Parninsih, I., & Abubakar, A. (2025). The Phenomenon of Bugis Tafsir on Islamization in Eastern Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 26(2), 444–468. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v26i2.6271
  30. Muis, A. (2020). Diskursus Islam-Sains Dalam Keilmuan (Studi Analisis Pemikiran Achmad Baiquni, M Amin Abdullah Dan Agus Purwanto). Dissertation . UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  31. Munawwir, A. W. (1997). Kamus al-Munawwir Arab–Indonesia (2nd ed.). Pustaka Progresif.
  32. Musa, A. F., & Khaidir, P. H. (2023). The Philosophical Sufism of Harun Nasution: A Phenomenological-Historical Investigation of The Influence of Neo-Mu’tazilism. Intellectual Discourse, 31(2), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.31436/id.v31i2.2054
  33. Mustofa, A. (n.d.)TAFSIR ULUL ALBAB. PADMA press.
  34. _________(2005). Ternyata akhirat tidak kekal (Vol. 2). PADMA press.
  35. Purwanto, A. (2015)., Ayat-Ayat Semesta: Sisi-Sisi Al-Qur’an Yang Terlupakan . 2nd edition. Jakarta: PT Mizan Pustaka, 2015.
  36. ¬¬_________. (2015). Nalar ayat-ayat semesta: Menjadikan al-Quran sebagai basis konstruksi ilmu pengetahuan. Mizan.
  37. Rakhmetkyzy, K. K. (2014). Sufi path of knowledge: The comparative analysis of the concepts of the Unity of Being (Wahdat al-Wujud) and the Unity of Witness (Wahdat ash-Shuhud). Life Science Journal, 11(2), 285–288.
  38. Rozi, S., Nurlizam, & Zubir, M. (2024). The Reception of Hamka’s Tafsir Al-Azhar within Social Religious Issues in the Malay World. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 25(2), 247–272. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v25i2.5406
  39. Shihab, M. Q. (1994). Membumikan Al-Qur’an: Fungsi dan peran wahyu dalam kehidupan masyarakat. Mizan.
  40. Supena, I. (2024). Epistemology of Tafsīr, Ta’wīl, and Hermeneutics: Towards an Integrative Approach. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 14(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.141.08
  41. Supriadi, A. (2018). Integrating Qur’an and science: Epistemology of tafsir ilmi in Indonesia. Refleksi, 16(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v16i2.10191
  42. Yucel, S. (2021). Rereading of the quran in light of nursi’s risale-i nur collection: Shuhudi exegesis. Religions, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12121088
  43. Yüksek, M. İ. (2023). The Nature of Understanding of the Qur’an in the context of Muhâsibî’s Fehmü’l-Qur’an/ Premises of The Scıence of Interpretation. Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi, 27(2), 538–558. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.1324849
  44. Yusuf, M. Y. (2017). Epistemologi Sains Islam Perspektif Agus Purwanto. Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 17(1), 65-90. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v17i1.898.

Informasi Terbitan

Terbitan
Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir
Bagian
Artikel
Diterbitkan
2025-12-31

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Cara Mengutip

Firdarini, Tauhidah, V., & Said, H. A. (2025). Transformation of Scientific Interpretation in Indonesia: An Epistemological Criticism of the Scientific-Religious Paradigm in the Works of Purwanto and Mustofa. Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Tafsir, 8(2), 304-317. https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqan.v8i2.4238