Articles Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir

Hasbi al-Shiddiqie’s Interpretation of Abrogation (Naskh–Mansūkh) in Qur’an 2:106 from a Sociology of Knowledge Perspective

Authors

Fithrotin
Institut Agama Islam Tarbiyatut Tholabah, Lamongan, Indonesia
Baiti Sekar Wangi
Fadlillah Fadlillah
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Diterbitkan: 2025-12-31
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqan.v8i2.4146
Bagikan Artikel Ini:
WhatsApp Facebook X

Downloads / Naskah Lengkap

Akses Terbuka
Unduh Berkas Lengkap Artikel Format PDF | Bebas diunduh dan dibaca untuk keperluan akademik & sitasi

Abstract

The concept of naskh–mansūkh (abrogation) has long remained one of the most contested issues in ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān, particularly with regard to its methodological legitimacy and epistemological implications in Qur’anic interpretation. This study critically examines the construction of naskh–mansūkh in Hasbi al-Shiddiqie’s interpretation of Qur’an 2:106 in Tafsir an-Nur by employing Karl Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge as its analytical framework. The primary objective of this research is to uncover how the meaning of naskh is produced, negotiated, and reconfigured within the socio-intellectual context of post-independence Indonesia. Adopting a qualitative-descriptive design grounded in library research, the study applies discourse analysis to Qur’anic exegesis, situating the interpretive text within the historical position of the exegete and the dynamics of Islamic intellectual tradition. Primary data are drawn from Tafsir an-Nur, supported by classical exegetical sources, Hasbi al-Shiddiqie’s intellectual writings, and theoretical works on the sociology of knowledge. The findings demonstrate that Hasbi al-Shiddiqie does not conceptualize naskh–mansūkh as the literal annulment of Qur’anic rulings or texts, but rather as a process of contextualization and semantic reconciliation aimed at preserving the enduring normative relevance of revelation. From a Mannheimian perspective, this interpretive stance reflects a pattern of relationism, in which the meaning of naskh emerges through a dialectical engagement between classical exegetical authority and the social demands of modern Indonesian society. This study argues that naskh–mansūkh in Tafsir an-Nur represents a socially situated intellectual construction that embodies an effort toward exegetical reform without undermining the authority of the Qur’anic text. By doing so, the article contributes to Indonesian Qur’anic studies and advances broader discussions on the interplay between interpretation, social context, and epistemic authority in Islamic scholarship.

Kata Kunci:
#Hasbi al-Shiddiqie #Naskh–Mansūkh #Tafsir an-Nur #Sociology of Knowledge #Karl Mannheim

Kata Kunci / Keywords

5 Kata Kunci

Daftar Pustaka / References

34 Referensi
  1. Abdelnour, M. G. (2023). The Qurʾān and the Bible: Abrogation (naskh) or confirmation (taṣdīq)? Religions, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14070856
  2. Abdul-Rahim, R. (2017). Demythologizing the Qur’an: Rethinking revelation through naskh al-Qur’an. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 7(2), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.7187/gjat122017-2
  3. Adnir, F., & Syukri, S. (2020). Manhaj Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqie dalam bidang hadis: Metode, pemikiran, kritik ulama, serta kelebihan dan kekurangannya. Shahih: Jurnal Kewahyuan Islam, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.51900/shahih.v3i2.8911
  4. Alak, A. I. (2024). The impact of Islamic theories of revelation on humanist Qurʾanic hermeneutics. Studia Islamica, 119(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1163/19585705-12341484
  5. Amir, S. B., Hilmi, A. B. A., Abdullah, M. B., & Norasid, M. A. (2024). The dynamism of social, literary, and hermeneutical streams in classical and modern Qur’anic exegesis. Al-Bayan, 22(2), 190–215. https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-20240150
  6. Anshori, M. (2019). Wawasan baru kajian nāsikh–mansūkh: Analisis pemikiran Maḥmūd Ṭāhā dan Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naʿim. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 4(2), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.32505/tibyan.v4i2.899
  7. As-Shiddieqy, T. M. H. (2009a). Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur’an (ʿUlūm al-Qur’an).
  8. As-Shiddieqy, T. M. H. (2009b). Sejarah & pengantar ilmu al-Qur’an dan tafsir (H. F. H. As-Shiddiqy, Ed.; 3rd ed.).
  9. Asman. (2021). The red yarn of contemporary Islamic law reform: A critical study of Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naʿim’s thought. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, 21(1), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v1i1.4193
  10. Ash-Shiddiqy, H. (2000). Tafsir al-Qur’an Majid an-Nūr (Vol. 1, pp. 264–265).
  11. Aziz, T. (2018). Problema naskh dalam Al-Qur’an: Kritik Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqie terhadap kajian naskh. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15575/al-bayan.v3i1.2286
  12. Baranowski, M. (2019). Sociology of knowledge in times determined by knowledge. Society Register, 3(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2019.3.1.01
  13. Burke, P. (2019). The history of knowledge: Social or cultural history? In Cultural history in France: Local debates, global perspectives (pp. 40–47). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295386-6
  14. Burton, J. (2019). The sources of Islamic law: Islamic theories of abrogation. Edinburgh University Press.
  15. Fadhilah, R. (2016). Konsep nasikh mansukh di era modern dalam perspektif Imam al-Ṭabāṭabāʾī. Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, 8(2), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.34001/ijshi.v8i2.4726
  16. Faruq, U. Al, Agustina, A., Hamida, S. D., & Hamna, N. (2024). Al-nāsikh dan al-mansūkh. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.47134/pjpi.v1i3.414
  17. Fikri, R. (2021). Teori nasakh al-Qur’an kontemporer (Unpublished master’s thesis). UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
  18. Gábor, T. (2019). Karl Mannheim as a transdisciplinary thinker and the problem of the sociology of intellectuals. Magyar Filozófiai Szemle, 63(1), 143–155.
  19. Hammersley, M. (2022). Karl Mannheim’s Ideology and Utopia and the public role of sociology. Journal of Classical Sociology, 22(2), 176–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X20986382
  20. Hempel, D. (2019). From Bloch’s utopian surplus to Žižek’s fantasmatic spectre. Journal of Political Ideologies, 24(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2019.1631540
  21. Hoenig, B. (2025). Karl Mannheim and the sociology of knowledge. In Research handbook on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 69–83). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376649.00012
  22. Ichwan, M. N., Ming, D., & Sya’roni, M. (2025). Bridging tradition and modernity. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(Special Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.2021
  23. Iman, F. N. (2019). Mitologi naskh intra-Qur’anic. Nun: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir di Nusantara, 4(2), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.32495/nun.v4i2.66
  24. Irfanuddin, M., & N, A. M. (2023). Nâsikh Mansûkh Dan Implementasinya dalam Tafsir Al-Qur`an ul Majid An-Nūr Karya Muhammad Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy. (2023). Bersatu: Jurnal Pendidikan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, 1(3), 88-107. https://doi.org/10.51903/bersatu.v1i3.319
  25. Langermann, Y. T. (2024). Naskh (“abrogation”) in Muslim anti-Jewish polemic. Religions, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15050547
  26. Pfadenhauer, M., & Berger, P. L. (2017). The new sociology of knowledge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315133485
  27. Razali Ibrahim, M. S. (2023). The concept of marriage from Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqiey’s perspective. Miqot: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 47(1), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v47i1.1078
  28. Remmling, G. W. (2020). The sociology of Karl Mannheim. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003074335
  29. Soleman, A., & Tohis, R. A. (2022). Science feminis: Sebuah kajian sosiologi pengetahuan. Spectrum: Journal of Gender and Children Studies, 1(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.30984/spectrum.v1i2.171
  30. Syaifudin, M. (2019). Prof. T. M. Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqi and his views on nasikh and mansukh. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 140, 48–50. https://doi.org/10.2991/iscogi-17.2019.12
  31. Ummam, N. I., Zulliandi, Y. B., & Zarnuji, M. I. (2024). Ash-Shiddiqiey’s criticism of the nāsikh–mansūkh theory. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v23i1.456
  32. Vandenberghe, F. (2025). A diagnosis of the sociology of our time. In Research handbook on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 23–44). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376649.00009
  33. Vasegh, M., & Mohammadi, A. (2022). Epistemological criticism on sociology of knowledge. GeoJournal, 87(6), 4719–4739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10526-y
  34. Yaşar, M. A., & Nas, T. (2022). Abu Ubayd’s understanding of naskh. Hitit Theology Journal, 21(1), 689–716. https://doi.org/10.14395/hid.1064547

Informasi Terbitan

Issue
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir
Section
Articles
Published
2025-12-31

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Fithrotin, Wangi, B. S., & Fadlillah, F. (2025). Hasbi al-Shiddiqie’s Interpretation of Abrogation (Naskh–Mansūkh) in Qur’an 2:106 from a Sociology of Knowledge Perspective. Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Tafsir, 8(2), 286-303. https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqan.v8i2.4146